Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
en:brandverhalten-von-compacfoam [2016/01/28 14:40] michaelfriembichler |
en:brandverhalten-von-compacfoam [2018/11/13 09:28] (current) michaelfriembichler |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
COMPACFORM was subjected to a test for fire behaviour according to standards and classified as Euroclass E. | COMPACFORM was subjected to a test for fire behaviour according to standards and classified as Euroclass E. | ||
- | Compacfoam can be considered to correspond to B2. Class E is in fact correct since the designation B2 refers to a previous standard that is no longer valid although it remains in use. | + | Compacfoam can be considered to correspond to B1. Class E is in fact correct since the designation B1 refers to a previous standard that is no longer valid although it remains in use. |
You can find a comparison of technical requirements between the “old” standard DIN 4102-1 and the “new” standard DIN EN 13501-1 at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandverhalten | You can find a comparison of technical requirements between the “old” standard DIN 4102-1 and the “new” standard DIN EN 13501-1 at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandverhalten |